Did someone say MMT? Yes, there is a huge smoke and mirrors game between the Treasury and the Federal Reserve. It's like that for messy historical reasons, but here is the truth. US Dollars are a creation of the Federal Government. It makes a lot of people cry to hear that, but facts don't care about your feelings, right guys? So the Federal Government does not tax or borrow to get the money to spend. It creates the money at will (don't cry). Taxes create the demand that gives USD their value. If you can enforce a tax, people will do what you want in order to get the tax credits (USD) to pay the tax. The Fed Gov issues debt when it spends to drain reserves to maintain the interest rate.
So the Fed Gov can never run out of its own money. We could pay of the entire US debt tomorrow without any difficulty. But that probably wouldn't be a good idea, because then everyone would have all this cash they wouldn't know what to do with. Federal Debt and deficits are good things. They equal our net saving. A deficit is always the other side of a surplus.
It's been like that all through history. Even when the Emperor's image was stamped on metal, that coin traded above the value of the metal (otherwise people would melt it down). Why was it worth more than the value of the metal? Because you needed those coins to pay your taxes. Even Jesus knew this. Was Jesus an MMTer?
Why does the Government tax then? To get people to work for it. And the Government in a Democracy is our agent. At least it is supposed to be.
yeah, theres a full video detailing this called the Collapse of the American dream explained in animation that can be found just by typing it in on Youtube for anyone who wants to learn more about this
Thats the whole modern scheme... Ahhhh It kinda Works... Ima kinda slave but freedome is so confusing... For simplicity lets forget about How the scheme Works... Since It kind of works its better than the hard work to really understand It and when u understand is sooo f depressing ignorance is bliss
Yea totally disliking these footnote videos. Especially since it's been a while since I've seen the videos they're referring to. I think it's ok to include a footnote clip at the end of the full video.
Nononono please don't just ignore that, that's a super important topic. The only online media that goes into significant depth about money creation is the Zeitgeist movies, which have... other issues.
@S Edwards I don't know most of that you said because I havent watch the other movies yet just the first one but can I ask what part in the first movie was not to be taken seriously? I'm really curious it all seemed so believable. Thanks
@brain toaster Research issues, mostly related to the conspiracy theories in the first movie. Plenty of people will dismiss the first movie out of hand simply because of the 9/11 section, many parts of which have been debunked, and even Peter Joseph himself has said that the first movie was more of a thought piece than something to be taken 100% seriously. Also length issues. The second, and most interesting, movie is over two long-winded hours on only two topics, and the third is a three-hour defense of the second. And realism issues. While Jacques Fresco's vision is grand and worthy of consideration, it's also unrealistic because it includes the dismissal of arts and culture in favor of a strict scientific mindset. Fresco seemed to believe that the humanities have no value to society. Worse, the Venus Project has adamantly refused to make his blueprints public following his death, which runs contrary to the spirit of cooperation for the betterment of humanity. The split between TVP and the Zeitgeist Movement highlighted the fact that Roxanne Meadows, who controls Fresco's legacy since his death, is more interested in personal gain than improving society.
Sort of. It only works as long as people believe it works, and the government has virtually unlimited money, as the national debt never actually has to be paid off. Look up Modern Money Theory if you wish to learn more.
This is not capitalism. This a government structure. Goveemnet structure cannot be capitalist as there is no market in the government. Capitalist can be the economy around it.
These footnotes are not that. CGP Grey comes back from the void with half a dozen footnote videos, and they're all going to be on YT Trending before we're done with them.
@Cam Free it only counts videos the creator marks specifically. So creators have to opt in every video and patrons have the option to not "accept" a certain video and not pay for it. So given the nature of these footnote, I highly doubt Grey is opting then in.
@aditya Patreon has the option of paying per video uploaded rather than per month if you link it to your NOburn channel, and that's what he has set up, but idk it counts every video uploaded as part of that or just the main ones.
Sometimes I get the feeling that a huge bulk of modern economics, in all of it's intricacies, is all just an elaborate way of saying 2 + 2 = 5 so that modern governments can get away with spending more money than they have. Like... the system isn't sustainable, but they just pretend it is and hope it will all work out in the end.
Storing an amount of gold as a reserve is very different to pegging your currency to it. Since the scarcity of any material (gold included) is subject to change, the amount of gold circulating must be controlled to prevent your economy crashing when you come across a lot of it. Since gold is difficult to control, this makes your economy liable to crashing simply because you chose to peg it to the gold standard. On the other hand, paper money is easy to control, and hence that risk can be mitigated. I actually agree that governments shouldn't simply inflate the currency for short-term benefit, but that far outweighs the long-lasting risk that using the gold standard presents.
@Convergant the reason you want a finite, scarce supply is because it's not easy to control. It is naturally controlled if the standard is adhered to. Instead of trying to prevent the government from shrinking debt by inflating the monetary supply with many laws, all you need to do is make sure a certain amount of physical gold is stored and verifiable for each dollar in circulation/printed. It doesn't matter how many dollars per amount of gold as long as it's not too small. The problem is not the currency being scarce or liquid, it's the government's ability to make the currency scarce or liquid. They will almost always tend towards making it liquid (inflation) because it benefits the economy temporarily (as long as it continues) and allows money to be funneled between the classes (legislation to inflate monetary supply endorsed by elites) without the general population noticing because the process is so slow and invisible.
Equivocation fallacy; I obviously wasn't referring to market libertarianism, but instead to the fact that using gold only ties your economy to a finite resource (whereas paper money is, for all intents and purposes, infinite), and that since all currency, in all forms, only has the value given to it by its users, restraining yourself by using a basis which is finite and who's supply is very difficult to control is clearly futile.
@Jonathan Olson Scarcity has no inherent value, so gold suffers all the same problems that paper money does; just now, if you come across a big supply of gold, there goes your economy. By not relying on a scare resource, you liberate the economy from said scarcity.
@Endre Szentgyorgyi these videos were linked to in annotations in the original video and this person clicked on then and commented. But now annotations have been removed so Grey has uploaded the videos to public
Make a video on the monetary and sovereign debt system of the United States. I kinda know the most of the story, and I think it would make a great subject for a CGPGrey video, because of all its intricacies and technicalities. Plus it is sorta important for people to know about, and people could gain from learning about it (so as not to be swayed by manipulative half-truths, so often distributed by opportunistic fear-mongers, on that subject).
While I am impressed that you bothered making video footnotes I would prefer if clicking the link would open another tab instead of terminating the main video
If I let the footnote play to completion, it automatically sends me back to the video at the time I clicked off...idk if this is the case for you since youtube is glitch city.
I like these little videos that goes into specifics but could you make them open in new tabs? Because every time i go back to the main video i have to find where i was before because youtube doesn't keep track of where i was
0:15